At the risk of sounding like a total Toady, I think John Wesley was a great man. Indeed, I think it was a scandal that he was not included in the top 10 Greates Brits. He certainly had a more profound effect on society than the likes of John Lennon and Princess Diana.
Indeed, coming from Cornwall I am very aware of how he changed the lives of many of my ancestors. Brought up two miles from
Gwennap Pit I still get a thrill when I visit the place and imagine ow thousands of Cornish miners were brought to faith in that great ampitheatre. In fact one of my most exciting experiences as a preacher, was in taking one of the Sunday afternoon services that are held in the Summer in the Pit.
However, I have always suspected that I would find Mr Wesley rather difficult to get on with. He was just too demanding for an easy going guy like me and I have to admit that his authoritarian rule over Methodism, howver necessary it may have been in an emerging movement, is the sort of thing that brings out the Bolshevik in me.
Last week, one of the things I had to do at the Probationers Committee was to answer questions regarding two of Mr Wesley's sermons. This freaked me out somewhat as I have a rather deficient memory and I really messed up on this at my interview to become a local preacher in 1989. Sometimes, I think that the only reason they passed me was because the minister who had been my tutor was about to leave and I was his only chance to preach at a local preacher accredition service before moving to his new appointment.
To make things easier I used a modern translation of Mr Wesley's sermons which had been put together by james D. Holway. However, I still found them rather heavy going.
Anyhow, as I read the sermons that I had chosen to look at, "The Almost Christian" and "The Catholic Spirit" I found myself exploring the question ast to how these sermons would go down today with our 21st Century congregations.
I found "The Almost Christian" to be a rather priggish sermon. I was struck at how much Wesley expected of an "almost Christian." Such people are expected to have a level of seriousness that seems quite extraordinary in today's world. I guess the time gap is there. At times, I find Wesley rather condescending in the way he sees their motives. Their charitability is describes as that which helps others "as long as it doesn't cause them inconvenience." Sorry Mr Wesley but I believe that altruism doesn't only occur amongst Christians! As for in the section on their "honesty" suggesting that this includes the avoidance of debt, I see how different our world are for today the explosion of house prices means that many are mortgaged up to the hilt and other goodies such as student loans and increased opportunities for gambling, mean that debt is today a simple fact of life. Indeed, I rather suspect that the British economy would collapse if we all decided to get out of debt.
As for becoming an "altogether Christian" I feel that Wesley comes close to being one of those who expects comparable experiences to himself if one is to be seen as a Christian. I find this an unhealthy trait in religion. Indeed, whilst in this sermon, wesley suggests that he was not a Christian until his Aldersgate experience, other writings by him at a later date suggest a very different conclusion. Which is his definitive view, I am not sure.
I like what Wesley has to say as what is an "altogether Christian" in terms of basic attitudes. I just struggle with those who think they can make what Good Queen Bess describes as "windows into men's souls." The problem is that this can be a controlling form of religion.
Anyhow, on to "The Catholic Spirit." My first thought is that it is based on a scripture that is wrenched out of context. Jehu is hardly an advert for any form of toleration. He is best remembered for massacring the relatives of Ahab and he demonstrates not so much a "Catholic Spirit" as the mentality of a psychopath. I was always taught that to take Scriptures out of context in such a way is to do violence to the Scripture. Still, next time I do it, I can claim to be following Mr Wesley's lead.
Much of the sermon is attractive. Writing at a time of religious intolerance, Wesley seems to be ahead of his time. I think, however,that the liberty lies between different types of Churchmanship rather than within one's own denomination. Still, Wesley has much to offer us about about seeing Christianity in other parts of God's Church. He is right in pointing out that we should not go down the sort of meaningless road which says that differences of worship and faith don't matter. Such a road can easily lead to the sort of Christianity that is without passion and conviction. It is as false a road as is the demonisation of those who are different than oneself.
However, in stressing loyalty to one's own congregation, I feel that Wesley doesn't make the point that to me is at the heart of ecumenism. this point is that one can be enriched by fellowship with those of other traditions. A book that made this clear to me was
David Butler's "Dying to Be One which has a survey which shows that different traditions have different strengths and weaknesses. Certainly I have been enriched by the times when I have stepped out of Methodism and been enriched by Baptists, Roman Catholics and Anglicans amongst others. Surely, whilst roots are important, so to is the chance to experience what other traditions can share with us also important.
Anyhow, none of this is intended to diminish the great respect I feel for John Wesley. Much of what is within his sermons is inspiring in today's world just as it was over two centuries ago. However, like all preachers, some of what he preached is somewhat alien to us today.
All of this brings me to a simple question. Will what I preach soon be outdated? And if as I suspect the answer is that much of what I preach will seem meaningless all too soon, how do I work at having something useful to share in ten years time or will I simply fossilise? You see, John Wesley for all that is dated, seems to stand the test of time much better than most.